Evaluasi Pengelolaan Sampah Kecamatan Gresik Kabupaten Gresik Ditinjau Dari Aspek Teknis
Keywords:Gresik, Landfill, Ngipik, Solid Waste Management
Solid waste management is a serious challenge for the government in making policies, so integrated and sustainable waste management is needed. Gresik Regency is one of the areas that support the development of the city of Surabaya so it is experiencing rapid growth in all sectors. The condition of the capacity of the Ngipik landfill waste cell serving the Gresik sub-district has experienced an overload. The problem in this research is how solid waste management in Gresik district is viewed from the technical aspect with an evaluation that refers to the applicable laws and regulations on waste so that the research objectives are obtained by analyzing the technical aspects. This study uses quantitative data and qualitative data methods and then analyzed them by conducting a review of aspects related to the validity of existing conditions according to normative standards and waste management theory. The evaluation results obtained as follows: The level of waste reduction has not yet reached 30% and waste services in Gresik sub-district by: 100%, there is still at least a willingness to store segregated containers, there are still TPS without roofs, transportation has been fulfilled but the fleet and containers are still available, not feasible, the location of the Ngipik landfill is feasible based on SNI 03-3141-1994.
Badan Standarisasi Nasional. (1994). SNI 03-3241-1994 Tata Cara Pemilihan Lokasi Tempat Pembuangan Akhir Sampah. Jakarta Badan Standarisasi Nasional.
Azwar, M., Sampah, J., Gilbert, M., & Sampah, S. (2011). Evaluasi pengelolaan persampahan di kota manado (studi kasus: kec. wenang). 1996, 130–140.
Badan Standarisasi Nasional. (2002). Tata Cara Teknik Operasional Pengelolaan Sampah Perkotaan.
Behzad, M., Hashemkhani, S., Pamucar, D., & Behzad, M. (2020). A comparative assessment of solid waste management performance in the Nordic countries based on BWM-EDAS.
Djiha, S. R. (2020). Teknis operasional pengelolaan sampah kabupaten ngawi. 386–392.
Fathoni, M. Z. (2018). Penentuan Lokasi Alternatif Tempat Pembuangan Akhir Sampah ( TPA ) Menggunakan Quantitative Method. XIX(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.30587/matrik.v19i1.531
Han, X., Hu, C., & Lin, L. (2019). A study on the impact of China ’ s urbanization on the quantity of municipal solid waste produced.
Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 97 Tahun 2017.
Irawan, I., & Papia, J. C. (2021). Evaluasi Sistem Pengelolaan Persampahan di Perkotaan Amurang Waste Management System Evaluation in Amurang Urban Area. 10(1), 56–63.
Tato, S. (2015). Evaluasi Pengelolaan Sampah Kabupaten Gowa Studi Kasus Kecamatan Somba Opu. 65–79.
Kharismawati, W., Putra, H. P., & Iresha, F. M. (2017). Evaluasi Aspek Teknik Operasional Pengelolaan Sampah Kabupaten Sleman.
Li, J., Wu, W., Jin, Y., Zhao, R., & Bian, W. (2021). Research on environmental comfort and cognitive performance based on EEG + VR + LEC evaluation method in underground space. Building and Environment, 198(April), 107886.
Permen PU RI No.01, tahun 2014. (2014). PERMEN PU RI NO.01 PRT M 2014 Tentang Standar Pelayanan Minimal Bidang Pekerjaan Umum Dan Penataan Ruang.
Phelia, A. (2019). Sistem Pengelolaan Sampah Di TPA ( Studi Kasus TPA Bakung Kota Bandar Lampung ). 25, 85–100.
Pramestyawati, T. N. (2019). Estimasi Pelayanan Pengangkutan Sampah Kabupaten Pamekasan. 151–156.
Talent Nia Pramestyawati1 dan I.D.A.A. Warmadewanthi2Teknologi, M. K. (2014). Non Residential Solid Waste Reduction in Krembangan District, North Surabaya. 113–122.
Thamrin, H., Dunggio, I., & Rahim, S. (2022). Evaluasi Kebijakan Pengelolaan Sampah Di Kota Gorontalo. 4(1), 44–55.
Timothy, T. D., Moonsammy, S., Deborah, T., Ansel, G., & Natoya, R. (2021). Evaluation of waste dynamics at the local level : The search for a new paradigm in national waste management. Environmental Challenges, 4(April), 100130.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, adaptation, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.