Analysis of Society Satisfaction of The E-Toll System In Indonesia Based On Structural Equation Model


  • M. Fariz Fadillah Mardianto Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Rosyida Widadina Ulya Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Almira Sophie Syamsudin Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia



Structural Equation Modelling, Society satisfaction, e-toll system, Innovation, Infrastructure development


The implementation of the use of the e-toll system has several evaluations from the community. This evaluation affects community satisfaction with the e-toll system. It is important to know public satisfaction so that the government can evaluate what factors are lacking from the e-toll system so that the service is better. In this study, the method used in the satisfaction analysis is Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). This study uses data based on the results of online questionnaires that have been tested for validity and reliability. In this study, the dimensions of service quality were assessed from the elements of reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy and physical evidence. Based on the results of the study, the community is satisfied with the use of the e-toll system on toll roads. However, there are two of the five dimensions of service quality that are very significant, namely the dimensions of reliability and assurance. For this reason, the government needs to pay more attention to reliability and provide guarantees for the e-toll system.


Download data is not yet available.


R. Larry, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Concepts, Applications, and Misconceptions. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2015.

M. Ahmad, A. Zainol, N. M. Darus, Z. Marzuki Matt, F. Baharom, and M. Y. Shafiz Affendi, “Knowledge transfer in problem-based learning teaching method in software engineering education: A measurement model,” ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci., Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 1486–1493, 2015.

M. Z. Yusoff, M. Mahmuddin, and M. Ahmad, “A knowledge work productivity conceptual model for software development process in SME,” ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci., Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 1123–1130, 2015.

M. Ahmad, N. M. Zani, and K. F. Hashim, “Knowledge sharing behavior among flood victims in Malaysia,” ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci., Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 968–976, 2015.

K. F. Hashim, S. H. Ishak, and M. Ahmad, “A study on social media application as a tool to share information during flood disaster,” ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci., Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 959–967, 2015.

R. Hoyle, Automated structural equation modeling strategies. 2016.

M. F. F. Mardianto, D. R. Hastuti, D. A. Husada, and R. Andriawan, “Comparative analysis of the competitiveness between Indonesian movies against international movie, as a reference in developing Indonesia’s cinema and curriculum about cinematography,” Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang., Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 685–707, 2019.

S. McQuitty and M. Wolf, “Structural Equation Modeling: A Practical Introduction,” J. African Bus., Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 58–69, 2013, DOI: 10.1080/15228916.2013.765325.

R. E. Schumaker and R. G. Lomax, A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling, Second. New Jersey London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2005.

A. Anekawati, B. W. Otok, Purhadi, and Sutikno, “Structural Equation Modelling with Three Schemes Estimation of Score Factors on Partial Least Square (Case Study: The Quality of Education Level SMA/MA in Sumenep Regency),” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., Vol. 855, No. 1, 2017, DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/855/1/012006.

S. Kumar, “Structure Equation Modeling Basic Assumptions and Concepts: A Novices Guide,” Asian J. Manag. Sci., Vol. 03, No. 07, pp. 25–28, 2015.

D. L. Streiner, “Finding our way: An introduction to path analysis,” Can. J. Psychiatry, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 115–122, 2005, DOI: 10.1177/070674370505000207.

B. M. Byrne, Structural Equational Modeling with AMOS blue book. 2010.

Kuzairi, M. F. F. Mardianto, Mawaddah, Ahmad, H. Sakdiyah, and Faisol, “Analysis of Factors Affecting Youth Motivation in Madura to Improve Education with the Structural Equation Modeling Method,” Vol. 410, No. 1, pp. 268–271, 2020, DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.200303.065.

A. N. Zulkifli, M. Ahmad, J. A. Abu Bakar, R. C. Mat, and N. M. Noor, “Examining the influence of interactive persuasive learning among elderly,” ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci., Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 1145–1153, 2015.

A. Banerjee and S. Chaudhury, “Statistics without tears: Populations and samples,” Ind. Psychiatry J., Vol. 19, No. 1, 2010, DOI: 10.4103/0972-6748.77642.

S. K. Thompson, Sampling, Third. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Publication, 2005.

N. Showkat and H. Parveen, “In-depth interview: Quadrant-I (e-Text). ”August 2017.

J. Tejada and J. Punzalan, “On the misuse of Slovin’s formula,” Philipp. Stat., Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 129–136, 2012.

R. Lupiyoadi, Manajemen Pemasaran Jasa: Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: PT. Salemba Emban Patria, 2001




How to Cite

M. Fariz Fadillah Mardianto, Rosyida Widadina Ulya, & Syamsudin, A. S. (2021). Analysis of Society Satisfaction of The E-Toll System In Indonesia Based On Structural Equation Model. Jurnal Matematika MANTIK, 7(2), 115–123.