Types of Creative Spaces in Bandung and Their Supporting Contexts

Authors

  • Ihsan Maulanar Robbany Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Josephin Maria Pastika Atidipta Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Shabrina Amalia Ihsanti Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Vadya Dzauqiah Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Agus Suharjono Ekomadyo Institut Teknologi Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29080/eija.v5i2.779

Keywords:

creative space, creative space type, supporting context

Abstract

The creative class is a group of people who utilize their creative thinking as a way to solve problems by creating innovations. The development of the creative class in the urban regions of the world results in a term called the creative city. Inside a creative city, the activity of the creative class establishes the needs for spaces that can accommodate their activities. Bandung, one of a creative city in Indonesia, has a lot of creative spaces. This research aims to map the types of creative spaces in Bandung, including their relationship with their contexts. This is achieved through the study of three cases, Kompleks Gudang Selatan, Lo.Ka.Si Coffee & Spaces, and Bandung Creative Hub. The mapping of creative spaces is done using the quantitative and qualitative scoring systems through observation, user interviews, and management interviews. Study about contexts is done using interviews and literature studies. The result of this research shows that those 3 cases, as creative spaces, are dominated by presentation space. This is supported by factors in their firm aspects. Moreover, it is found that the creative industry in Bandung is currently still oriented at presentation activities

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ekomadyo, A. S., Santri, T., & Riyadi, A. (2018). Habitat for Innovative Milieu: A Place-Making Study of University and Start-up Enterprises Relationship. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 152, 012020. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/152/1/012020

Florida, R. (2014). The Rise of the Creative Class--Revisited: Revised and Expanded. New York: Hachette UK.

Herawati, T., Rudatin, C. L. T., & Akbar, D. (2014). Potensi Kota Bandung Sebagai Destinasi Incentive Melalui Pengembangan Ekonomi Kreatif. Epigram, 11(2), 95–102. doi: 10.32722/epi.v11i2.672

Kristensen, T. (2004). The Physical Context of Creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(2), 89–96. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-1690.2004.00297.x

Oksanen, K., & Ståhle, P. (2013). Physical environment as a source for innovation: Investigating the attributes of innovative space. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(6), 815–827. doi: 10.1108/JKM-04-2013-0136

Pancholi, S., Yigitcanlar, T., & Guaralda, M. (2015). Place making facilitators of knowledge and innovation spaces: Insights from European best practices. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 6(3), 215–240. doi: 10.1504/IJKBD.2015.072823

Siregar, F., & Sudrajat, D. (2017). Enabling Spaces: Mapping Creative Hubs in Indonesia Fajri Siregar—Academia.edu (p. 54). Retrieved from Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance website: https://cipg.or.id/creative-hubs/

Thoring, K., Desmet, P., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2019). Creative Space: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED19), 1, 299–308. doi: 10.1017/dsi.2019.33

Thoring, K., Luippold, C., & Ueller, R. M. M. (2012). Creative Space In Design Education: A Typology of Spatial Functions. Prosiding EPDE 2012, 6. Retrieved from https://www.designsociety.org/download-publication/33233/Creative+Space+in+Design+Education%3A+A+Typology+of+Spatial+Functions

Thoring, K., Mueller, R. M., Desmet, P., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2018). Design Principles For Creative Spaces. Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018, 1969–1980. doi: 10.21278/idc.2018.0233

Downloads

Published

2020-02-11

How to Cite

Robbany, I. M., Atidipta, J. M. P., Ihsanti, S. A., Dzauqiah, V., & Ekomadyo, A. S. (2020). Types of Creative Spaces in Bandung and Their Supporting Contexts. EMARA: Indonesian Journal of Architecture, 5(2), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.29080/eija.v5i2.779